Regulators expect an organisation to be able to demonstrate that consent was obtained. So when a choice is made, an anonymous record is logged: the timestamp, which categories were granted, how the choice was made, and which page the banner was answered on.
No IP address is stored. No user agent, no identifier, no cookie linking the record to you. It is enough to show the mechanism works and produces the pattern of choices it should, and not enough to re-identify anyone — which is the correct trade for an audit record and, we would argue, the only defensible one.
This means we can answer an auditor asking whether consent is genuinely optional, and we cannot answer anyone asking what you personally chose. Both of those are intentional.