PlatformsFaststream SiliconFaststream RadioFaststream VisionConnected EdgeFaststream SecureMobility & Rail
ProductsSemiconductor IPWireless & RANEdge & GatewaysTracking & IdentificationSoftware & FrameworksConnected Systems
TechnologyRTL to GDSIIVerification methodologyDFT and silicon testLow-power designMixed-signal integrationDesign enablement5G protocol stackWireless and RF architectureBaseband and low PHYForward error correctionControl and data planeHigh-speed interfacesFirmware and bootSilicon root of trustSoftware-defined vehicleAutomotive OTAFunctional safety
AIAI Engineering ServicesEdge AI & Embedded MLComputer Vision EngineeringSensor Fusion & PerceptionAI Silicon & AccelerationMLOps for DevicesAI Visual InspectionPredictive MaintenanceDriver MonitoringVideo Analytics & Safety
SolutionsSemiconductorIndustrial AIConnected ProductsAsset TrackingAutomotive & MobilitySmart InfrastructureSecure IdentityWireless & SatelliteSmart WashroomsFuel ManagementSmart BuildingsWorker SafetyEnergy MonitoringSmart AgricultureSmart CityAutonomous PlatformsAssembly AutomationLiDAR Rail SafetyHardware Wallet
IndustriesSemiconductorTelecommunicationsIndustrial & ManufacturingAutomotive & MobilityTransportation & RailAerospace & DefenceHealthcare & MedicalEnergy & UtilitiesOil & GasRetailConsumer ElectronicsMedia & EntertainmentSmart Infrastructure & IoT
ServicesSystem Integration overviewASIC & SoC DesignFPGA DesignFPGA-to-ASIC ConversionAnalog, Mixed-Signal & RFHardware & High-Speed PCBEmbedded SoftwareCloud, OTA & Device ManagementManufacturing TransitionHow we engage
InsightCase StudiesKnowledge CenterWhite PapersGlossaryNewsletterResources & Support
CompanyAbout FaststreamEngineering ExcellenceLeadership & OrganisationHow We EngageQuality & ComplianceStandards & EcosystemPartners & EcosystemTrust CentreLocations & DeliveryNewsroom & MediaCareers
ContactStart a projectHow we engage
Talk to an engineer
REFERENCE

Choosing a wireless link for asset tracking

Range, accuracy, power and infrastructure pull against each other, and the site usually decides before the datasheet does. This is the comparison, with the trade-offs stated rather than implied — including the cases where the honest answer is two links rather than one.

ShareLinkedInXEmail
Range against what it costs you
RELATIVE RANGENFC≈10 cm · no batteryRFID UHF1–12 m · no batteryUWB10–50 m · sub-metre, monthsBLE10–100 m · 1–5 yearsWi-Fi30–100 m · mains typicalLoRaWANkm · 5–10 yearsCellularwide area · weeks–yearsSatelliteglobal · highest per messageRange, power, accuracy and infrastructure trade against each other. Nothing wins on all four.
COMPARISON

The six that matter.

Wireless link comparison for tracking
LinkRangeAccuracyBattery lifeInfrastructureCost per point
NFCUnder 10 cmIdentity, not positionPassive or yearsReader at point of useVery low tag cost
RFID (UHF)1–12 mPortal or zonePassiveReaders at choke pointsLowest tag cost
BLE10–100 mZone to a few metres1–5 yearsGateways on siteLow
UWB10–50 mSub-metreMonths to 2 yearsAnchor network on siteHigher, both tag and anchors
LoRaWAN2–15 kmCoarse, or GNSS-assistedYearsGateway and network serverLow, once gateways exist
Cellular with GNSSWide areaMetres outdoorsWeeks to yearsOperator coverage onlyHigher, plus data plan
NTN satelliteGlobalMetres outdoorsLower per messageSky visibilityHighest per message
HOW TO DECIDE

Four questions, in order.

What granularity does the answer need? Which building, which room, or which bay. Most requirements stated as which bay turn out on examination to be which room, and that difference is the entire cost of a UWB anchor network.

Does the asset leave the site? If it does, a site-infrastructure link alone cannot follow it, and a wide-area transport is required for at least part of the journey.

What infrastructure already exists? Wi-Fi coverage, a LoRaWAN gateway, RFID portals at doors. Reusing what is installed is frequently the difference between a viable business case and a rejected one.

How often must it report, and for how long? Reporting policy dominates battery life far more than cell chemistry, so this question determines the energy budget more than the link choice does.

COMMON MISTAKES

What goes wrong at specification.

COMMON QUESTIONS

What engineers ask before they call.

01

Which wireless link is best for indoor asset tracking?

BLE for zone-level to few-metre accuracy with multi-year battery life and modest infrastructure; UWB where sub-metre accuracy genuinely matters and an anchor network is affordable; RFID where portal reads at choke points are sufficient. The right answer depends on whether the question is which room or which bay.

02

Can one device use more than one link?

Yes, and it is often the correct architecture. A device that uses BLE indoors and cellular with GNSS outdoors produces one continuous asset history rather than two partial ones.

03

Why is quoted battery life often wrong in practice?

Because it is quoted against an assumed duty cycle at room temperature. Real reporting intervals, real temperature ranges and real retry behaviour on marginal coverage all shorten it, sometimes by a large factor.

FOUND THIS USEFUL?

Pass it on.

Written for engineers. Share it with one.

ShareLinkedInXEmail
KEEP READING

Related work.

BUILD WITH FASTSTREAM

Bring us the difficult part.

Tell us the specification, the constraint and the deadline. Programmes that cross silicon, radio, embedded and AI are where Faststream is strongest.